|
1.
Public comment on non agenda items
None.
2. Waterfront Planning
Nate said Morgan was invited to this meeting.
He is not present.
Wayne: City Council has been negotiating with
DeBoers over tank farm. It is a complex issue. Negotiations
are at impasse. Planning for waterfront is contingent on use of
that land. AG will interpret convenants. Need to hold off
on waterfront planning until the AG opinion is made.
Agenda item was at Greg's request. Greg:
area from Salmon River to Glen's ditch will be area for placing
facilities--for visitors, freight, etc. Should we have forward
looking oversight of area? Ecotourism--they look at the forefront
area. What will waterfront look like when dock and tank farm is
there. Allison thinks this committee should not do this
function. Would make us no longer the uninvolved
entity.
Closest thing we've done like this is the scoping
form which came from the socio-econ-environ concerns. Smack some
of planning and zoning. (Carolyn) Lands committee could
take on as a focus point as a watch dog? (Bruce) This is
overarching and involves many of the committees. Ken: have
to look at fragileness of committees. Lands and MFC committees
are fragile now.
Allison: maybe planning committee could be
assigned this as a planning function. Wayne: need to define
purpose and need. Mike: land legacy has a plan that would
be a good place to start. Nate: need to have 2
opportunities for public comment. Wayne: Planning committee
would do scoping to define purpose and need and put out a draft
plan. Need decision first so we know what jurisdiction.
Would need coop resource agreement with DNR and it would require a
plan. Greg: includes boat harbor and DRC sites.
Includes some private land and some Mental Health Trust Land.
City land, DNR land and covenanted land. Wayne: 2
scenarios. One is that all facilities including freight staging
and tank farm would be within DOT ROW. The other is that it could
be within convenant land and be better designed and more
beautiful. Ken: other option is that we can't do
anything. May have to go to court interpretation.
Wayne: hold off on this until the first of the year.
3.
CIP list
Nate: GCN committee knows they will need
funding for broadband. Have hired Borealis to come in and make a
proposal. Should we allow the proposal to go in for CIP without a
final budget? Ken: would not close the door. Early
proposals should get attention first. The proposals so far total
only $85,000. We should leave it open for a while.
Firehall siding being asked for? Bruce will ask
Corey.
Plumbing and Electrical upgrade for preschool.
Value/Vision B, goals 4&5.
Wilson Road Culvert. Is included in project
list in strategic plan under Capital and Physical Infrastructure.
Should be made more clear that it is a drainage system, not just a
single culvert. Needs scope of project. Refer back to road
committee. Wayne will do that.
Foot Trail and Beach Access. Value/Vision D
goal 4. Project is listed in Health, Social and Cultural
Projects.
Community Clinic Access to High Speed Internet.
Does not specify what technology, so if GCN could get 900 mhz radios,
could use that or Starband. Value/Vision B goal 1&2. Is
this project redundant to the GCN project. May need
explanation--Clinic needs immediate.
Wayne: smaller projects probably won't get
funded. Carolyn: last year projects like trails were
vetoed. Projects like roads were funded. Wayne: some
of the smaller projects could be funded by endowment grants. GCN
broadband is fundamental service.
Carolyn: we can prioritize with the smaller
less appropriate projects further down the list.
4. Policy on Policy. Wayne: wanted
a foundation statement. Policy can drive the process. Can
underlie or umbrella ordinance. Is a philosophy. Any
citizen or committee can put forth policy.
Allison: can the city council use the strategic
plan values and visions as a starting point for policy before launching
in projects.
Adjourned 9:40
|